On Jan 5, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi All, > > +1 on the new release. > > But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010, month 04) is > already long gone.
The name 2010-04 is actually the date when the feature freeze happened: after that date only bug fixes have been committed to the 10.04 branch, not new features. Jacopo > > Regards, > > Pierre > > 2011/1/4 Young Gu <[email protected]> > >> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04, >> how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now? >> >> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion. >> >> Thanks& Best Regards, >> >> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com >> >> >> >> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >>> Are we ready to discuss about this now? >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> >>> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is not a formal vote yet. >>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release >>>>> of Apache OFBiz 10.04? >>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, >>>>> we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it >>>>> will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider >>>>> it >>>>> our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug >>>>> fix >>>>> releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...). >>>>> >>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so >>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this. >>>>> >>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year. >>>> This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to >>>> think about this. >>>> >>>
