From: "Adam Heath" <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Fri Jul 2 10:32:58 2010
New Revision: 959943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959943&view=rev
Log:
Revert r959673 on Scott's advice. There is already a getCategoryMembers. A bit different but it's ok, as it does not make much
sense to sort categoryMembers with another field than sequenceNum
Sorting by name?
Yes I thought about it, but would need more work (we don't have the internalName in CategoryMember). If we really need it then we
should preferably reuse the method I firstly posted in CommonWorker.java but then in ProductWorker. BTW maybe we could have both,
not a big deal, just a parameter to add in the service def and a switch on it (if exists) to one or the other implementations.
Note also that this is convenient when you have only a bunch of products per category, clearly more than a dozen begin to be too
much... I guess it's why nothing like that exists OOTB... But dependent dropdowns at large are still useful...
Jacques
