Scott Gray wrote: > Any progress on this? If not I think we should consider reverting, not > being able to work on groovy scripts at runtime is a bit of pain for > development.
Does that mean you've confirmed it then?
Scott Gray wrote: > Any progress on this? If not I think we should consider reverting, not > being able to work on groovy scripts at runtime is a bit of pain for > development.
Does that mean you've confirmed it then?