Hi Nicolas, Although we didn't make a decision, mixed in with this thread - https://lists.apache.org/thread/8pyhnjs65ss6btsl8r93w6z21pyksclt - is a discussion about abandoning the 22.01 branch in favour of creating a new branch from trunk.
The justification for creating a new branch was to capture a lot of the Groovy refactoring work that had gone into trunk without duplicating a similar level of effort to port those same changes to the 22.01 branch. I believe we left the conversation - but once again, we did not make an official statement or carry out any sort of vote - broadly in favour of creating a new branch some time after the completion of the Groovy refactoring work. I would now expect this to be a 24.01 branch created early in the new year. Thanks, Dan. On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 15:51, Nicolas Malin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > If I understood well, you propose to rename the 22.01 on 24.0.1.01 to > be more synchronize with it releasing time ? If is no worries with this > but what the name for the branch to stabilization ? > > Cheers, > Nicolas > > Le 08/12/2023 à 17:53, Michael Brohl a écrit : > > Hi Nicolas, > > > > given the time gone by I am thinking about if we should do an early > > 24.x release instead of 22.01. 22.01 sounds quite old with the year > > 2024 just a few days ahead. > > > > But yes, it would be great to have a new stable release out soon. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Michael Brohl > > > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > > > > Am 08.12.23 um 16:10 schrieb Nicolas Malin: > >> Hello all, > >> > >> I know that I go out from my cave :D, there was a lot of work on the > >> OFBiz improvement quality this year on groovy and deployment process. > >> > >> I saw two issues [1][2] to solve before run a release process. Do you > >> saw other element before try to release the 22.01.01 ? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Nicolas > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726 > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12868 > -- Daniel Watford
