>From the discussion, the major concern of vendor HAL in Zephyr is the code
duplication for the same IP.
But in NuttX, even the native chip integration still duplicates a lot of
code which share the same IP.
Should NuttX driver integration switch from arch/chip/xxx to driver/xxx/yyy
like Linux/Zephyr?
So, the chip could share the code if they use the same hardware IP block.

Thanks
Xiang

On Fri, Oct 2, 2026 at 4:12 AM Alan C. Assis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ahmed,
>
> I think the issue you raised is valid; they have an enormous number of
> developers because the project was promoted very strongly starting in 2016
> when it became part of the Linux Foundation.
>
> However, having fewer people doesn't mean we should take the easy way out
> and end-up in the same quality situation they are currently facing.
>
> In fact it is better to have less supported hardware, but a few very well
> supported ones.
>
> So, I was trying to accept the idea that the HAL was good for NuttX, but
> after reading that thread, I think it will be the opposite.
>
> Vendors will add integrations with poor HAL quality and we will inherit
> responsibility for that bad code.
>
> BR,
>
> Alan
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 4:47 PM Ahmed Ashraf <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I read a bit from the discussion, so they want to make the drivers native
> > implemented right?
> >
> > I think this will be easier a bit because they have a nice number of
> > specialized maintainers for each area, iam a bit new contributor to
> Nuttx (
> > and to Zephyr too ) I didn't see that number of contributers in Nuttx
> which
> > could make it harder. I think making specialized groups of maintainers
> for
> > each area ( just like Zephyr do ) would make the migration easier.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ahmed
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2026, 10:23 PM Alan C. Assis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > While we discuss making HAL official on NuttX, the Zephyr project is
> now
> > > discussing avoiding it:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/108088
> > >
> > > I think it's too late for them, but we still have a chance...
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to