On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:35 PM Nathan Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 2:58 PM Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> wrote: > > 4. Code owners, we tried, maybe we should retry. I like the idea that > > if someone contributes somewhere that means they have insight and will > > help others so they will be assigned to "ownership" based on git > > history :-) > > Hmm, "code owners" implies only the owner can make changes, others will be > afraid to contribute. Maybe "code experts" instead? The more you contribute > to an area, the more expert you are likely to be there!
Yup exactly :-) Code Gurus :-) :-) The problem is we are really small team overloaded with daily tasks and existing backlogs. Its a spare time tasking. Last time we tried that people were afraid to take even more work on their head and I am in the same situation :-P But its more like who can we ask about specific subject, or take a look at changes, or ask for hints, not necessarily take responsibility and burden of all of the work to do for someone :-) I like the idea to identify based on past contributions. But how to implement this? :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
