As in, the NuttX community would need to start moving over initialization
out of NSH and into the board initialization?

On Fri, May 2, 2025, 11:54 PM Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The quick approach is coping the initialization routine to your
> application, but it isn't an elegant solution.
> A better approach is splitting the general initialization functionality
> from nsh to init like other POSIX operating systems.
> But, the second approach needs more work.
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 10:19 AM Matteo Golin <matteo.go...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Currently working on an application for a network controlled switch box.
> > So far everything has gone great and we've
> > finally completed our application that is capable of sending switch
> > commands over the network using NuttX on the
> > W5500-EVB Pico.
> >
> > I have one last hurdle left for this project, and that is automatically
> > booting into our application instead of
> > `nsh_main`. I have done this before for other less involved applications
> > and typically only needed to do some `boardctl`
> > calls to start up the USB shell. This time, however, I need to start up
> > networking at boot time without relying on NSH's
> > initialization.
> >
> > I read through the docs and found that this is done in `nsh_netinit()`
> > (since renamed `netinit_bringup` I believe).
> > After reading through some of the code I see it performs some important
> > tasks like setting the MAC address (W5500 has
> > software MAC only), etc. I am wondering if there is a suggested way for
> me
> > to perform all these task without needing to
> > use NSH. I suppose I can include the `netutils.h` file into my
> application
> > and call it myself? Is there anyway to
> > initialize the networking infrastructure within board code, like
> > `board_appinit()`? I can't access the `netutils`
> > library from board code, and it appears that networking is one of the few
> > initialization tasks without a `boardctl`
> > call.
> >
> >
> Any help is appreciated! Thank you,
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Golin
> >
>

Reply via email to