On Wed, 26 Feb 2025, 10:32 raiden00pl, <raiden0...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 from me. > > 1. It's a waste of already limited resources in this project. > > 2. It makes life harder for contributors, by for example requiring > separation of PRs on arch/boards/doc. Extra work for contributors to > compensate for the project's limited resources is not okay. >
we only need separate commits not PR which is a best practice and improves readability > > 3. Regarding the above point: I don't see the point in separating changes > that MUST BE implemented together. In this way, error detection by > CI won't be impossible in some cases. > > 4. LTS should have some quality assurance, which involves testing as many > features as possible in the current NuttX. Otherwise it makes no sense. > At this time, NuttX doesn't have the resources for this. > We can provide fixes and improve the LTS releases compardd with the regular releases which brings a stability benefit for users that maintain oftree boards > > śr., 26 lut 2025 o 10:08 Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > This vote proposes to start the LTS releases for NuttX RTOS > > > > The proposed LTS release plan is > > - 1st release each year is a LTS release (maintained for 1.5 years) > > - 6 minor releases for each release > > ex: 13.0.0-13.0.6 for our first LTS release > > > > Voting will be open for 72hr. > > > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 binding than -1 are required > to > > pass. > > > > Best regards > > Alin > > >
