Hi,

I would make the scope even more restricted. Considering an LTS should be
100% compatible with an existing defconfig, it should not add new drivers
and new HW. I propose it to contain only bugfixes and security patches.

Best regards,

Em ter., 11 de fev. de 2025 às 08:27, Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> I propose that for our first LTS we start with a small scope and we
> backport only fixes, new hw and drivers
>
> For the future releases we may consider expanding the scope if the workload
> permits
>
> What do you think ?
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:55 AM Laczen JMS <laczen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alin,
> >
> > I also encourage this. I would start by defining what is expected from a
> > LTS:
> >
> > A LTS release of NuttX is a release that will be maintained and
> > supported over a longer period of time (1 year).
> > LTS updates are mainly focused on bugfixes that where discovered and
> > corrected during the support period.
> > These bugfixes will be backported to the LTS release.
> >
> > Should new features and hardware be allowed in a LTS? If so, how many
> > releases should they have been in?
> > Many users will keep there own defconfig for a certain product, should
> > they remain valid? If so are Kconfig changes allowed?
> >
> > Anyhow thanks for the proposal,
> >
> > Jehudi
> >
> > Op di 11 feb 2025 om 10:02 schreef Michael Jung <michael.j...@secore.ly
> >:
> > >
> > > Hello Alin,
> > >
> > > I would love to see this, as it would make maintaining our product much
> > > easier.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the proposal.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 9:55 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > there have been suggestions that we should create LTS releases
> > > >
> > > > I propose that we mark every Q1 (match) release as a LTS release and
> > > > maintain it for 2 years. this would always ensure a fresh LTS
> > overlapping
> > > > the old one and allowing the users to migrate the code to the new
> > release.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Alin
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to