On 2025-02-03 22:45:29, Xiang Xiao wrote: > The ai bot is a soft suggestion, not a rule from Lup introduces it > initially. > Many PR already contain the useful information, like these: > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15749 > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15728 > But ai bot still complain the information isn't enough. > Even https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15437 already contains the enough > information to explain why this change is made. Yep, especially this section of PR perfectly explains steps performed to not break anything:
> Testing > > Update this section with details on how did you verify the change, > what Host was used for build (OS, CPU, compiler, ..), what Target was > used for verification (arch, board:config, ..), etc. Providing build > and runtime logs from before and after change is highly appreciated. That PR touched WHOLE cpu family, and yet not a single test was performed on real hardware it seems. -- .-----------------.-------------------.----------------------.-----------------. | Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address | .-. opensource | | +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer | Akacjowa 10a; 55-330 | oo| supporter | | https://bofc.pl `----.--------------: Brzezinka Sredzka PL | /`'\ & | | GPG FF1EBFE7E3A974B1 | Bits of Code | NIP: 813 349 58 78 |(\_;/) programer | `----------------------^--------------^----------------------^-----------------'
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
