Hi Felipe, good to hear about your progress here!

These functions are ROM-defined functions. By checking the TRM, you can see
a read-only flash partition that holds some functions (widely used
functions, like malloc and internal functions).

ets_get_cpu_frequency
<https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/blob/1a1545b6ffb54029259ba8691d9ee200bfda2471/components/esp_rom/esp32c6/ld/esp32c6.rom.ld#L32>
is
one of these internal functions. They are defined directly at the linker
script.

If I understood correctly, these functions are crashing when it's being
called, right? If so, can you:

   1. Share the crash dump
   2. Use GDB and try to check where/why it fails: it may trying to access
   some prohibited memory region or even trying to call an unregistered
   callback.

Thanks!

Em sex., 1 de nov. de 2024 às 13:41, Felipe Moura Oliveira <
moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Tiago, I am trying to work with light sleep for now, after it work will go
> ahead with deep sleep. To run in light sleep I don't need to change linker
> so I was able to build and flash without "image" issues.
> Now I am facing other kind of issue:
> Some functions refers to "ets" function and I don't know how handle this,
> for instance:
>
> /**
> * @brief Get the real CPU ticks per us
> *
> * @return CPU ticks per us
> */
> uint32_t esp_rom_get_cpu_ticks_per_us(void);
>
> This function is necessary in the *sleep_modes.c* file. During execute code
> I am facing crash when this function is called, its happen because its
> implementation is a reference to other function:
>
> arch/risc-v/src/esp32c6/esp-hal-3rdparty/components/esp_rom/esp32c6/ld/esp32c6.rom.api.ld:46:PROVIDE
> ( *esp_rom_get_cpu_ticks_per_us* = ets_get_cpu_frequency );
>
> I cannot find *ets_get_cpu_frequency*, so how should I handle it?
>
> PS: I have another situation like this, when I try to call
> *esp_rom_set_cpu_ticks_per_us* function.
>
> Regards.
>
> Em ter., 29 de out. de 2024 às 13:24, Felipe Moura Oliveira <
> moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > Hello Tiago.
> >
> > Please look de draft here: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14548
> >
> > This branch will refer to the updated 3rd-party in my repo.
> >
> > You only need to enable PM in menuconfig and it will be enough to see
> > changes.
> >
> > Em ter., 29 de out. de 2024 às 13:10, Tiago Medicci Serrano <
> > tiago.medi...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> >> Hi Felipe,
> >>
> >> Can you share your PR as a draft on GH to make it easier to check the
> >> files
> >> (and the build process)?
> >>
> >> Em ter., 29 de out. de 2024 às 12:41, Felipe Moura Oliveira <
> >> moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >>
> >> > Hello Tiago,
> >> >
> >> > I "finished" the port, but after it my esp32c6 dev kit is resetting.
> >> Maybe
> >> > the issue is related my changes in
> >> > boards/risc-v/esp32c6/common/scripts/esp32c6_sections.ld. Can you give
> >> some
> >> > tips about how to go ahead?
> >> >
> >> > Below you can see nuttx report:
> >> > Build:Sep 19 2022
> >> > rst:0x7 (TG0_WDT_HPSYS),boot:0x7f (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT)
> >> > Saved PC:0x40018bea
> >> > SPIWP:0xee
> >> > mode:DIO, clock div:2
> >> > load:0x40800000,len:0x61e0
> >> > load:0x408061e0,len:0xc34
> >> > load:0x50000000,len:0x20
> >> > load:0x5000001e,len:0x24
> >> > Invalid image block, can't boot.
> >> > ets_main.c 331
> >> > ESP-ROM:esp32c6-20220919
> >> >
> >> > Em ter., 29 de out. de 2024 às 08:46, Felipe Moura Oliveira <
> >> > moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> >
> >> > > Hello everyone,
> >> > >
> >> > > I was able to solve linker issues, editing the linker by myself. I
> >> need
> >> > to
> >> > > finish more than one build issue before testing it, so I will see
> if I
> >> > made
> >> > > the right changes in linker.
> >> > >
> >> > > Em seg., 28 de out. de 2024 às 16:01, Felipe Moura Oliveira <
> >> > > moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >
> >> > >> *Hello everyone, Tiago,*
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I have made progress with the build issue I was encountering and am
> >> now
> >> > >> "stuck" at what I believe is one of the final stages. I am
> >> experiencing
> >> > the
> >> > >> following compilation error:
> >> > >> LD: nuttx
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld: warning:
> >> > /home/felipe-moura/nuttxspace/nuttx-felipe/nuttx
> >> > >> has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld:
> >> /home/felipe-moura/nuttxspace/nuttx-felipe/staging/
> >> > >> libarch.a(sleep_modes.o): in function
> >> > >> `esp_set_deep_sleep_wake_stub_default_entry':
> >> > >> sleep_modes.c:(.rtc.text.4+0x0): undefined reference to
> >> > >> `_rtc_force_fast_end'
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld: sleep_modes.c:(.rtc.text.4+0x4): undefined
> >> reference
> >> > >> to `_rtc_text_start'
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld: sleep_modes.c:(.rtc.text.4+0x8): undefined
> >> reference
> >> > >> to `_rtc_force_fast_end'
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld: sleep_modes.c:(.rtc.text.4+0xc): undefined
> >> reference
> >> > >> to `_rtc_text_start'
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld:
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> /home/felipe-moura/nuttxspace/nuttx-felipe/staging/libarch.a(sleep_cpu.o):
> >> > >> in function `esp_sleep_cpu_retention':
> >> > >> sleep_cpu.c:(.iram1.8+0x200): undefined reference to
> >> > >> `rv_core_critical_regs_save'
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld: sleep_cpu.c:(.iram1.8+0x21e): undefined
> reference
> >> to
> >> > >> `rv_core_critical_regs_restore'
> >> > >> riscv-none-elf-ld: sleep_cpu.c:(.iram1.8+0x226): undefined
> reference
> >> to
> >> > >> `rv_core_critical_regs_restore'
> >> > >> make[1]: *** [Makefile:189: nuttx] Error 1
> >> > >> make: *** [tools/Unix.mk:551: nuttx] Error 2
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I would greatly appreciate your assistance.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Focusing on the item _rtc_text_start, I see that it is defined in
> the
> >> > >> file:
> >> > >>
> >> arch/risc-v/src/chip/esp-hal-3rdparty/components/esp_system/ld/esp32c6/
> >> > >> sections.ld.in
> >> > >>
> >> > >> However, I am unsure how to add this file to the complete linking
> >> > >> process. I added this file to hal_esp32c6.mk, but I received the
> >> > >> following error:
> >> > >> LD: nuttx
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> riscv-none-elf-ld:/home/felipe-moura/nuttxspace/nuttx-felipe/arch/risc-v/
> >> > >> src/chip/esp-hal-3rdparty/components/esp_system/ld/esp32c6/
> >> > >> sections.ld.in.tmp:113 cannot move location counter backwards (from
> >> > >> 40809800 to 40800000)
> >> > >> make[1]: *** [Makefile:189: nuttx] Error 1
> >> > >> make: *** [tools/Unix.mk:551: nuttx] Error 2
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Does anyone have any tips or suggestions that could help me move
> >> forward
> >> > >> with this process?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thank you in advance for your help.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> *Best regards,*
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Em sex., 25 de out. de 2024 às 12:02, Tiago Medicci Serrano <
> >> > >> tiago.medi...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Hi Felipe,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> The RTC GPIO is a feature of the GPIO/RTC driver, so a substitute
> >> for
> >> > >>> this
> >> > >>> function should be part
> >> > >>> of `nuttx/arch/risc-v/src/common/espressif/esp_rtc_gpio.c`. That
> >> being
> >> > >>> said, you can either implement it (and define it as a macro, on
> >> HAL) or
> >> > >>> you
> >> > >>> can either ignore these functions related to GPIO wakeup from
> sleep
> >> for
> >> > >>> now
> >> > >>> (using, for instance, the `#ifndef __NuttX__`). It's up to you: if
> >> the
> >> > >>> GPIO
> >> > >>> wakeup isn't mandatory, it'd go baby steps, removing this feature
> >> for
> >> > >>> now.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Best regards,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Em sex., 25 de out. de 2024 às 09:33, Felipe Moura Oliveira <
> >> > >>> moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> > Hello Tiago,
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Thank you for your assistance earlier.
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > I would like to discuss further the necessity of the
> >> > >>> > esp_driver_gpio/include/rtc_io.h file, which is only available
> in
> >> the
> >> > >>> IDF.
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > In sleep_modes.c, there is the following code snippet:
> >> > >>> > esp_err_t esp_sleep_enable_ext1_wakeup_io(uint64_t io_mask,
> >> > >>> > esp_sleep_ext1_wakeup_mode_t level_mode)
> >> > >>> > {
> >> > >>> > if (io_mask == 0 && level_mode > ESP_EXT1_WAKEUP_ANY_HIGH) {
> >> > >>> > return ESP_ERR_INVALID_ARG;
> >> > >>> > }
> >> > >>> > // Translate bit map of GPIO numbers into the bit map of RTC IO
> >> > numbers
> >> > >>> > uint32_t rtc_gpio_mask = 0;
> >> > >>> > for (int gpio = 0; io_mask; ++gpio, io_mask >>= 1) {
> >> > >>> > if ((io_mask & 1) == 0) {
> >> > >>> > continue;
> >> > >>> > }
> >> > >>> > if (!esp_sleep_is_valid_wakeup_gpio(gpio)) {
> >> > >>> > ESP_LOGE(TAG, "Not an RTC IO: GPIO%d", gpio);
> >> > >>> > return ESP_ERR_INVALID_ARG;
> >> > >>> > }
> >> > >>> > rtc_gpio_mask |= BIT(rtc_io_number_get(gpio));
> >> > >>> > }
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > I believe this code is essential for compilation. The function
> >> > >>> > rtc_io_number_get is located at the following path in the IDF:
> >> > >>> > components/esp_driver_gpio/include/driver/rtc_io.h.
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > However, the esp_driver_gpio folder is not present in the
> >> 3rd-party
> >> > >>> > directory. In this case, what is the recommended procedure to
> >> > proceed?
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Thank you again for your support.
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Em sex., 25 de out. de 2024 às 08:52, Tiago Medicci Serrano <
> >> > >>> > tiago.medi...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > > Hi Felipe,
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > `esp_private/pm_impl.h` is from the component `esp_pm` of
> >> ESP-IDF,
> >> > >>> which
> >> > >>> > is
> >> > >>> > > a driver directly. Same for `esp_driver_gpio/include/rtc_io.h`
> >> > >>> (here, a
> >> > >>> > > detail: I wasn't able to find this path on IDF, so make sure
> you
> >> > are
> >> > >>> > > checking under the `release/v5.1` branch, which the HAL was
> >> based).
> >> > >>> The
> >> > >>> > HAL
> >> > >>> > > repository doesn't contain ESP-IDF drivers, which are always
> >> > >>> implemented
> >> > >>> > on
> >> > >>> > > NuttX. For `esp_cpu.h`, it's already on HAL (at
> >> > >>> > >
> `esp-hal-3rdparty/components/esp_hw_support/include/esp_cpu.h`).
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > The files under `esp-hal-3rdparty/components/esp_hw_support`
> >> > >>> > > (`sleep_modes.c`, for instance) MAY be used to implement the
> >> > driver.
> >> > >>> This
> >> > >>> > > is, mostly, a wrapping layer under the function of `esp_rom`
> and
> >> > >>> `hal`
> >> > >>> > > components. However, they still may refer to ESP-IDF drivers.
> >> That
> >> > >>> being
> >> > >>> > > said, you can check if removing such dependencies is possible.
> >> We
> >> > >>> usually
> >> > >>> > > do that with conditional macros. A good starting point is to
> >> check
> >> > >>> for
> >> > >>> > > `#ifdef __NuttX__` on these sources and headers: we use them
> to
> >> > >>> > remove/add
> >> > >>> > > headers and functions that aren't available on NuttX/needed by
> >> > NuttX.
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > Best regards,
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > Em qui., 24 de out. de 2024 às 19:46, Felipe Moura Oliveira <
> >> > >>> > > moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > > Hello all,
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Tiago,
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > I have a question regarding the porting process.
> >> Specifically, I
> >> > >>> need
> >> > >>> > to
> >> > >>> > > > add the sleep_modes.c file to the compilation process. Am I
> on
> >> > the
> >> > >>> > right
> >> > >>> > > > path with this approach?
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > To achieve this, I modified the hal_esp32c6.mk file by
> adding
> >> > >>> > > > sleep_modes.c.
> >> > >>> > > > However, I am facing some issues: within sleep_modes.c, some
> >> > >>> #include
> >> > >>> > > > statements reference files that are not available in the
> >> > 3rd-party
> >> > >>> > > > directory but are only present in the IDF. For example:
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > >    - esp_private/pm_impl.h
> >> > >>> > > >    - esp_cpu.h
> >> > >>> > > >    - components/esp_driver_gpio/include/rtc_io.h
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > I need those includes because sleep_modes.c uses function
> from
> >> > >>> there.
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Could you please advise if it's possible to incorporate
> these
> >> IDF
> >> > >>> > folders
> >> > >>> > > > into the 3rd-party directory, or if that approach is not
> >> > >>> recommended?
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Thank you for your assistance.
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Best regards,
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Em qua., 23 de out. de 2024 às 15:21, Tiago Medicci Serrano
> <
> >> > >>> > > > tiago.medi...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Hi,
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Just another note to guide your development: we don't
> >> develop
> >> > >>> > anything
> >> > >>> > > on
> >> > >>> > > > > `esp-hal-3rdparty`: most of the code we use from it is
> >> derived
> >> > >>> from
> >> > >>> > the
> >> > >>> > > > > path
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>>
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/tree/release/v5.1.c/components/hal
> >> > >>> > > > > (essentially, header files from
> >> > >>> `components/hal/<chip>/include/hal`,
> >> > >>> > > > except
> >> > >>> > > > > for some of the sources files that use the hal functions
> at
> >> > >>> > > > > `components/hal` to implement some function we may use).
> You
> >> > can
> >> > >>> > take a
> >> > >>> > > > > look at the branch `
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c`
> <https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c>
> >> <https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c>
> >> > <https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c
> >
> >> > >>> <
> >> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c>
> >> > >>> > <
> >> > https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c>
> >> > >>> > > <
> >> > >>>
> >> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c>
> >> > >>> > > > <
> >> > >>>
> >> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c>
> >> > >>> > > > > <
> >> > >>> >
> >> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/commits/release/v5.1.c
> >> > >
> >> > >>> > > > and
> >> > >>> > > > > especially the commits beginning
> >> > >>> > > > > with faaa46ebfb37fba4250de831efbbf2862958c344 to check the
> >> kind
> >> > >>> of
> >> > >>> > > > changes
> >> > >>> > > > > we do in hal. Essentially, we create a wrapper layer to
> >> make it
> >> > >>> > > > independent
> >> > >>> > > > > of the host OS.
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > *Drivers must always be implemented on NuttX!*
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > That being said, you can either 1) try to adapt the
> >> > >>> implementation of
> >> > >>> > > > other
> >> > >>> > > > > devices to use the HAL functions or 2) get some
> inspiration
> >> on
> >> > >>> how
> >> > >>> > IDF
> >> > >>> > > > > implements PM. I'd stick with the 2nd option before simply
> >> > >>> trying to
> >> > >>> > > > adapt
> >> > >>> > > > > an existing implementation (from ESP32-C3 legacy or from
> >> > >>> > > ESP32/ESP32-S3).
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Best regards,
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Em qua., 23 de out. de 2024 às 13:35, Felipe Moura
> Oliveira
> >> <
> >> > >>> > > > > moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Hello Tiago.
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Thank you for clarification, I will follow your
> >> instructions.
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Em qua., 23 de out. de 2024 às 13:01, Tiago Medicci
> >> Serrano <
> >> > >>> > > > > > tiago.medi...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Hi Felipe,
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Just complementing: use your forked version of the HAL
> >> > >>> during the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > development. As soon as you have a working version,
> you
> >> can
> >> > >>> > submit
> >> > >>> > > on
> >> > >>> > > > > the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > official repository.
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Best regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Em qua., 23 de out. de 2024 às 12:58, Tiago Medicci
> >> > Serrano <
> >> > >>> > > > > > > tiago.medi...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Hi Felipe,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for asking! You should follow the path using
> >> the
> >> > >>> > functions
> >> > >>> > > > on
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > esp-hal-3rdparty. You can fork the repository and
> use
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> `ESP_HAL_3RDPARTY_VERSION=b4c723a119344b4b71d69819019d55637fb570fd
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > ESP_HAL_3RDPARTY_URL="g...@github.com:
> >> > >>> > > > tmedicci/esp-hal-3rdparty.git"`
> >> > >>> > > > > > env
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > vars (globally or before the make command) to use
> your
> >> > >>> version
> >> > >>> > of
> >> > >>> > > > the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > HAL.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > I just wanted to share some thoughts: using the HAL
> >> > >>> enables us
> >> > >>> > to
> >> > >>> > > > > make
> >> > >>> > > > > > > the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > feature available for all the Espressif devices
> >> (please
> >> > >>> don't
> >> > >>> > > > bother
> >> > >>> > > > > > with
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > that now, as soon as you submit it, we can test for
> >> the
> >> > >>> other
> >> > >>> > > > devices
> >> > >>> > > > > > and
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > eventually make any adjustments). Although it's
> >> possible
> >> > to
> >> > >>> > > > > reimplement
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > these functions on NuttX, we don't recommend that
> >> because
> >> > >>> of
> >> > >>> > the
> >> > >>> > > > > first
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > statement (the ability to use for the other
> devices):
> >> in
> >> > >>> that
> >> > >>> > > case
> >> > >>> > > > we
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > wouldn't be able to support the feature. You can
> take
> >> a
> >> > >>> look on
> >> > >>> > > IDF
> >> > >>> > > > > for
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > some inspiration on how it's implemented.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Best regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Em qua., 23 de out. de 2024 às 12:38, Felipe Moura
> >> > >>> Oliveira <
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > moura....@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> Our project has reached a point where we need the
> >> Power
> >> > >>> > Manager
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> functionality, which is not yet available in the
> >> > ESP32C6.
> >> > >>> I am
> >> > >>> > > > > > studying
> >> > >>> > > > > > > to
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> start the implementation, but I am confused about
> the
> >> > >>> correct
> >> > >>> > > way
> >> > >>> > > > to
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> approach this.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> There is a Power Manager implementation for the
> >> ESP32C3,
> >> > >>> but
> >> > >>> > it
> >> > >>> > > > > seems
> >> > >>> > > > > > to
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> follow the legacy methodology. In fact, the file
> >> > >>> > esp32c3_idle.c
> >> > >>> > > is
> >> > >>> > > > > > > located
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> in the path arch/risc-v/src/esp32c3-legacy. In this
> >> > >>> > methodology,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > functions
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> are re-implemented from the Espressif driver. For
> >> > >>> example, the
> >> > >>> > > > > > function
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> esp32c3_light_sleep_start(), which is currently
> >> > available
> >> > >>> in
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> esp32c6/esp-hal-3rdparty/.../sleep_modes.c.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> I tried using the implementations from
> >> esp-hal-3rdparty
> >> > to
> >> > >>> > > develop
> >> > >>> > > > > the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> Power Manager for the ESP32C6 in NuttX, but the
> files
> >> > >>> still
> >> > >>> > have
> >> > >>> > > > > many
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> dependencies on items that are not present in
> NuttX.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> My question is: Should I try to make the Power
> >> Manager
> >> > >>> work
> >> > >>> > > using
> >> > >>> > > > > the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> functions in esp-hal-3rdparty, even if it requires
> >> > making
> >> > >>> > > changes
> >> > >>> > > > to
> >> > >>> > > > > > the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> 3rd-party code? Or should I re-implement the
> >> functions
> >> > >>> within
> >> > >>> > > > NuttX,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > even
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> if, in this case, there are functions with the same
> >> > scope
> >> > >>> and
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> implementation in different files, where one is
> >> > compiled,
> >> > >>> and
> >> > >>> > > the
> >> > >>> > > > > > other
> >> > >>> > > > > > > is
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> not?
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> --
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> Linkedin <
> >> > >>> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Tiago Medicci Serrano
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Embedded Software Engineer
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > MSc Electronics/Microelectronics
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > m: +55 (19) 981403886 <+55+(19)+981403886>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > e: tiago.medi...@gmail.com
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > a: Campinas, Brazil
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Follow me:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiago-serrano-924458b6
> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > <https://github.com/tmedicci>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Tiago Medicci Serrano
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Embedded Software Engineer
> >> > >>> > > > > > > MSc Electronics/Microelectronics
> >> > >>> > > > > > > m: +55 (19) 981403886 <+55+(19)+981403886>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > e: tiago.medi...@gmail.com
> >> > >>> > > > > > > a: Campinas, Brazil
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Follow me:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiago-serrano-924458b6>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > <https://github.com/tmedicci>
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > > *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> >> > >>> > > > > > *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> >> > >>> > > > > > Linkedin <
> >> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > Tiago Medicci Serrano
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Embedded Software Engineer
> >> > >>> > > > > MSc Electronics/Microelectronics
> >> > >>> > > > > m: +55 (19) 981403886 <+55+(19)+981403886>
> >> > >>> > > > > e: tiago.medi...@gmail.com
> >> > >>> > > > > a: Campinas, Brazil
> >> > >>> > > > > Follow me:
> >> > >>> > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiago-serrano-924458b6>
> >> > >>> > > > > <https://github.com/tmedicci>
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> >> > >>> > > > *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> >> > >>> > > > Linkedin <
> >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> >> > >>> > > > <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > --
> >> > >>> > > Tiago Medicci Serrano
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > Embedded Software Engineer
> >> > >>> > > MSc Electronics/Microelectronics
> >> > >>> > > m: +55 (19) 981403886 <+55+(19)+981403886>
> >> > >>> > > e: tiago.medi...@gmail.com
> >> > >>> > > a: Campinas, Brazil
> >> > >>> > > Follow me:
> >> > >>> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiago-serrano-924458b6>
> >> > >>> > > <https://github.com/tmedicci>
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > --
> >> > >>> > *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> >> > >>> > *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> >> > >>> > Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> >> > >>> > <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> >> > >> *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> >> > >> Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> >> > >> <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> >> > > *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> >> > > Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> >> > > <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> >> > *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> >> > Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> >> > <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> > *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> > Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> > <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
> >
>
>
> --
> *Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> *Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais*
> Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> <https://twitter.com/FelipeMOliveir?lang=pt-br>
>

Reply via email to