On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 7:52 AM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:12 AM alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: > > This is great progress ! > > With an UI will be easier to handle > > Some important architectural decisions will have to take place when > designing the UI part for whole system and userland applications and > their interoperability (including external application store or > something like that in future). > > I have been fighting with "mobile applications" for Android and iOS > for years and there is no good stable and coherent solution right > now.. and probably there will never be as these enforced changes seems > to be part of the design.. in fact it all seems a "moving disaster" > for me, aka "catch the rabbit" game. > > I worked with native tools (Android Studio and XCode), cross platform > JavaScript (ReactNative, Vue), recently Python (Kivy). I also at some > point considered using LVGL on SDL2 then putting it all together into > a mobile application. Recently I even considered compiling whole NuttX > + LVGL + SDL and linking into a mobile application, after seeing NuttX > + LVGL demo on my desktop. There is still a unavoidable dependency on > a mobile platform SDK, NDK, etc, that constantly changes, and it is > hard to catch. I hope things will never get that way in NuttX :-) > > NuttX as independent (mobile) platform seems unavoidable for people > that just want simple things working. Maybe even on older hardware > that will again provide week or more battery life time :-) > > We just cannot get ourselves into a "modern mobile world mess" please :-) > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info >
I have seen those fast-moving-target frameworks described as having the "lifecycle of yogurt" in multiple places around the internet. +1 for stability!!! Nathan
