On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:55 AM Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, 1:46 PM Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, 1:37 PM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello world :-)
> >>
> >> I was on a trip recently (and it happens quite often) so I was looking
> >> for a PDF version of NuttX Documentation, kind of Handbook, but I did
> >> not find one.
> >>
> >> I got used to PDF Handbook style because it is all-in-one approach
> >> that is also easily available and searchable offline.
> >>
> >> As I am getting into details and reading the docs, so I can help this
> >> part :-)
> >>
> >> I would like to know what is the current and past approach to the
> >> documentation, to plan the work and align the tasks (with other people
> >> working on the documentation?). What is the future preferred way of
> >> documentation? git+documentation? (c)wiki?
> >>
> >> I know there is a doc part on the website that is generated from the
> >> main repository Documentation/ location. This part seems to need some
> >> improvement (looks a bit like incomplete copy-paste?) :-)
> >>
> >> I know there is a CWIKI. I know there was some bigger documentation
> >> before..?
> >>
> >> It would be best to have HTML and PDF documentation (maybe other
> >> formats too) in a form of "Handbook" (all-in-one-place + searchable +
> >> offline). This Handbook could be also provided in a form of e-book for
> >> free and maybe some pay-as-you-want basis to support the project. This
> >> would be also probably the first point of contact with the project for
> >> the newcomers.
> >>
> >> As a reference documentation I could point to:
> >> 1. https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/
> >> 2. https://kivy.org/doc/stable/
> >>
> >> Please let me know what you think folks :-)
> >> Tomek
> >>
> >> --
> >> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> >
> >
> >
> > It is easy enough to generate the PDF from the sphinx documentation if we
> > want that can you create an issue on the website project and I'll enable
> > that in a few weeks.
> >
> > --Brennan
> >
>
>
> Also I want to be very clear since this was incorrect
>
> > I know there was some bigger documentation before..?
>
> Others and I _extended_ and converted this to be what is now in
> Documentation it was a lot of work.  This is the documentation for the
> project although it has been slow to convert all the readmes and the wiki
> to be here. I would love to see others help with this time consuming
> effort.
>
> --Brennan
>

I wrote my reply before I saw this. Are there any more CWIKI pages that
need to be migrated into the repo?

Thanks for your (and other's) efforts in this area.

Nathan

Reply via email to