I agree with Frank-Christian on that! Also, is there some official ERRATA from ST about this slew-rate/frequency for STM32H7 ?
Is this really a chip issue or some board specific issue? BR, Alan On 4/10/23, Frank-Christian Kruegel <nu...@istda.com> wrote: > Am 10.04.2023 um 14:51 schrieb David Sidrane: > >> If I attempt to rephrase the proposal: Starting from a commit in a >> future, stm32h7 GPIO definitions will not include speed indications >> anymore, and these will have to be added manually in board.h, but ONLY >> if the LEGACY_PINMAP is not set? >> [DBS] Yes. This is correct. But also previously non suffixed pin. E.G. >> Where >> there were not ALT settings to choose which GPIO to use will contain a _0 >> suffix. > > I've designed several custom boards where I can put in an STM32F4, > STM32F7, or STM32H7 depending on chip availability and performance > needs. I've got board support packages for each family and keep them in > sync so I can deliver what is needed. > > My main concern and my loudest plea is: Please keep stm32f4, stm32f7, > and stm32h7 in sync. For me making changes that make sense and pay off > in the future are ok, but please make them on all stm32 families (at > least the big ones). > > Frank-Christian Kruegel > >
