Hi Alan, If it is working on other platforms, no problem, I will fix my devices later if I get a chance. I will put some details here in case someone with my setup runs into the same issue. After posting my message I downloaded 9.0.0 and 10.0.0 and tested the releases (9 works and 10 is broken). Here is an example of what works on my local build. I have two devices running an old NuttX build: ----------------------------- commit 28ac578cd325536e0fbe8eaeebba524827d0e3a6 (origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) Author: Gregory Nutt <gn...@nuttx.org> Date: Sat May 18 15:18:06 2019 -0600
Update ReleaseNotes in preparation for the 7.30 release. ------------------------------ I use one device to control the other. Let us call them HOST and TARGET. TARGET has some BLE services in it: heart rate, current time, battery etc. The original Intel source has a sample. I use HOST to interrogate TARGET knowing what value to expect. Replace XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX with the BDAddr found by the " bt bnep0 info" command. NuttShell (NSH) nsh> bt bnep0 gatt connect XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX public Connect pending... nsh> btnet_hci_connected: Connected bt bnep0 gatt discover XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX public 0x180d Discovered 1 handles: 0. handle 0x0006 perm: 01 nsh> When I update to the latest NuttX (or anything newer than 9.0.0) this does not work. The connect command hangs, presumably in the serial driver, since you say bt works on other platforms. Regards, Lwazi On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:27, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Lwazi, > > I don't know about CC2564, but BLE Stack was working recently to > ESP32, ESP32C3, nRF52, etc > > Is it related to this issue: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/8767 > > BR, > > Alan > > On 3/9/23, Lwazi Dube <lwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 13:16, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Welcome back go NuttX Lwazi (I'm not been sarcastic, I'm happy to hear > >> from you again! You have a great knowledge of BLE can we need! I was > >> expecting you to share that working example of BLE application using > >> our BLE stack). > >> > > Thanks, I don't know about "great knowledge", but I am not sure I will > > be doing any bt work this time. I checked. The current BLE stack is > > broken when I run it on my board with a cc2564 BT chip. The bt command > > fails to connect like it does on a 2019 tree that I have. I don't know > > what the point of the changes being made to bluetooth is, if such a > > basic feature remains broken after a merge. Is anyone really using or > > testing the NuttX stack? > >
