I did the D3 and D4 ports years ago and I am not aware of any other use of
those boards.  DMA was partially functional then, but was not well tested
and was still buggy.  There were problems documented in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/blob/master/boards/arm/sama5/sama5d4-ek/README.txt
which look like the same issues with the SAMA5D3x-EK in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/blob/master/boards/arm/sama5/sama5d3x-ek/README.txt

The D2 was more an effort of several people and was based initially on the
D4 (which was based on the D3).

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 8:30 AM TimH <t...@jti.uk.com.invalid> wrote:

> Aargh...too quick to retract. I think definitions for ATSAMA5D3 and
> ATSAMA5D4 are swapped and there *may* be inconsistencies, based on a
> comparison to datasheets. I don't think anyone has used it as I am 99% sure
> it wouldn't have worked as best as I can tell. File with issues is:
>
> arch/arm/src/sama5/sam_dmac.h
>
> It was the right file I was looking at, got confused by the presence of
> sam_xdmac.h as well as sam_dmac.h.
>
> I will had "# warning" for ATSAMA5D3 and ATSAMA5D4, and add a new section
> for SAMA5D2 which at least I hope to be able to check and confirm as
> working.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: TimH <t...@jti.uk.com.INVALID>
> >Sent: 12 September 2022 14:54
> >To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> >Subject: RE: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA
> >
> >Scrap that for now - was looking in the dma not xdma files
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: TimH <t...@jti.uk.com.INVALID>
> >>Sent: 12 September 2022 14:14
> >>To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> >>Subject: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA
> >>
> >>I am reworking DMA to get it working for the SAMA5D2. It seems to me
> >>that there are also errors and inconsistencies in the DMA code for the
> >>SAMA5D3 and D4 family.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>For now I have added "# warning" pre-processor statements. I have no
> >>means to check ATSAMA3 or ATSAMA4 devices - so unless someone can
> >>confirm that DMA does actually work for those 3 families and I've
> >>misunderstood something I will suggest that the warnings remain in
> >>place when I
> >eventually
> >>submit a PR for my work.
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to