On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 3:56 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Tomek, > Thank you for your support on it. > I don't know how we could avoid it, if someone decided that NuttX is > not relevant they can go on and try to suggest to remove the article.
Hmm looking at the activities from the IP address (USA/California?) that stated bias there were also some good commits for NuttX page. This may be someone from our community? Maybe a FitBit developer? :-P https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/96.46.149.166 > Fortunately I was on my computer today and saw it, but imagine if I > was in vacation? Yup, exactly, people not familiar with the subject are deciding on knowledge removal, quite frightening. > Maybe others here need to setup some notification to receive case > someone edit the NuttX page, I think wikipedia support it. I did some small update (stated FOSS directly after NuttX and before RTOS should be clear enough what kind of project this is) and thus subscribed to the page, I should get notifications too :-) > In the other hand, the only way we could get more awareness and making > NuttX more popular. Unfortunately nobody here replied to Alin emails > asking for help to NuttX Workshop, seems like nobody really cares > about NuttX and it is really sad. I would be more that glad to attend this kind of workshop but have nothing to offer to present yet sorry :-( World now seems a bit messy, probably on purpose by some groups of interests, people often have problems with basic life conditions now like food and accommodation, struggling to fulfill the Edison's vision of paying the bills, a time is most precious now and this is really sad I we cannot focus on important creative tasks as we would really wanted, its not always matter of "care" but "can" I guess. -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
