Hello,

I have NuttX running on the STM32U585 (B-U585I-IOT02A DevKit). Currently
only UART and SPI macros are supported, but I will continue to work in this
port.

I will do some clean-up and open a pull request in the next couple of days.
I would love to join forces on this effort.

Bye,
Michael

Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 10. Feb. 2022, 05:35:

> Here is the chip use M33:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/tree/master/arch/arm/src/rtl8720c
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:12 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There is good support for ARMv8-M and there are contributors using
> > proprietary ARMv8-M parts (probably Cortex-M33???), but no support for
> any
> > specific chips or boards have been contributed.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:07 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis <acas...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Aaron,
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022, Aaron Rito
> <aaronr...@geotab.com.invalid
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > To whom it may concern,
> > > >
> > > > I am reaching out on behalf of my organization (GEOTAB) regarding
> > kernel
> > > > support for the CORTEXM33, specifically the STM32U5 MCU. We are
> curious
> > > if
> > > > there are any plans to offer support for this chipset or if there may
> > be
> > > an
> > > > avenue for us to contribute to one if no plans exist. We thank you
> and
> > > look
> > > > forward to your response.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Since it is a relatively new MCU I think nobody started porting it yet.
> > >
> > > And because ARM Cortex-M33 is already supported and probably many
> > > peripherals are same/similar from others STM32 chips, this port should
> be
> > > fast to do (I hope).
> > >
> > > It was a good idea to post about it here to avoid duplicated efforts
> and
> > > also it could encourage others with some STM32U5 board to contribute
> with
> > > this port.
> > >
> > > Please follow the coding style running the nxstyle or the checkpatch -f
> > > from start, this way you will avoid issues when submitting the PR.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to