In the past someone tried to create a tool to autoformat the coding style of NuttX, but it wasn't finished and the result wasn't that great.
Most of issues reported on your PR are alignment, maybe some editor can help you to fix it automatically. But the remaining long lines should be fixed manually. BR, Alan On 1/15/22, fft <f...@feedforward.com.cn> wrote: > It seems that there are thousands of coding style problem,I was > frightened....this is a difficult task for me,Is there any tools that can > automatically modify the coding style problem? > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "Alan Carvalho de Assis"<acas...@gmail.com>; > Date: Sat, Jan 15, 2022 07:38 PM > To: "dev"<dev@nuttx.apache.org>; > > Subject: Re: Support of SPARC architecture > > > > That is a great news mister Zou! > > I saw there are some file that need to have its coding style fixed to > pass in the CI test: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/runs/4826456444?check_suite_focus=true > > You can also check locally the coding style using the checkpatch, this way: > > $ ./tools/checkpatch.sh -f arch/arm/src/am335x/am335x_boot.c > > In this case am335x_boot.c doesn't have any issue, then it doesn't > return anything, but your files with issues will return hints > explaining which line you need to modify. > > BR, > > Alan > > On 1/15/22, fft <f...@feedforward.com.cn> wrote: > > I have commit code to add SPARC support&nbsp; > > &nbsp; > > ------------------&nbsp;Original&nbsp;------------------ > > From: > &nbsp;"Alan&nbsp;Carvalho&nbsp;de&nbsp;Assis"<acas...@gmail.com&gt;; > > Date: &nbsp;Wed, Jan 12, 2022 08:57 PM > > To: &nbsp;"dev"<dev@nuttx.apache.org&gt;; > > > > Subject: &nbsp;Re: Support of SPARC architecture > > > > &nbsp; > > > > Hi Zou, > > > > That is amazing! We have already companies using NuttX for satellites > > (there is a video about it at NuttX Channel). > > > > Yes, please submit a Pull Request in our github to add Spark support, > > that will be welcome! > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > On 1/12/22, fft <f...@feedforward.com.cn&gt; wrote: > > &gt; > > &gt; Hi, Teams > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt;Two years ago, we tried to use NuttX on satellites, > > &gt; and I started the work to porting nuttx to BM3803, a SPARC V8 > > &gt; architecture chip manufactured by BMTI(Beijing > Microelectronics > > Technology > > &gt; Institute) which is based on open source CPU core----LEON 2 > released > > &gt; by Cobham Gaisler. about the SPARC V8 and LEON 2 see : > > &gt; > > &gt; https://www.gaisler.com/index.php/products/processors > > &gt; > > &gt; BTW the chip of AT697F of ESA(European Space > > &gt; Agency) is also based on LEON 2 see: > > &gt; > > &gt; > > > https://amstel.estec.esa.int/tecedm/website/conferences/PresentationDays/AT697_Atmel.pdf > > &gt; > > &gt;I finished the whole work last year, Include > > &gt; architecture support code and board support code, I even > completed and > > &gt; verified the Tickless OS mode and ELF file separate load on > this SPARC > > V8 > > &gt; chip. Due to some reasons, the project leader did not adopt > nuttx in > > the > > &gt; end, and I want to contribute code to the community. > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt; The Toolchain of SPARC V8 is standard SPARC gnu gcc > > &gt; released by Gaisler which can be download at: > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt; https://www.gaisler.com/index.php/downloads/compilers > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt; I initiated this discussion to seek your opinions, > > &gt; whether NuttX agree to include the SPARC arch in the scope of > support > > ? > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt; Best regards, > > &gt; Zou
