On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 6:29 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Instead removing the Wiki content en masse, a better approach might be > to move a few key wiki pages that have proven value into to documents? > Retaining the Wiki for easy contribution?
That's fair enough; I wasn't thinking of removing anything from CWIKI, but my thinking was to begin by importing the information with minimal changes into the repo, then over time the documentation can be massaged etc., and also maintained with the software. > On 7/19/2021 4:10 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote: > > I think we need a place where the community can simply contribute > > documentation without going through the entire PR process. I wrote > > 90+% of the wiki content and really like how responsive the wiki > > format is. Moving it to the repository is a project decision and is > > fine with me. However, I personally will never again touch it. Obviously I do not want to bring it into the repo it if it will cause a roadblock for anyone wanting to write documentation. I just don't want things to be forgotten in the CWIKI. Having it together with source code increases the chances that it won't be lost if, e.g., we stop having the CWIKI available. Not saying that would ever happen, just saying... Cheers, Nathan
