Hello all, I sent the results email and created the release
Best regards Alin -----Original Message----- From: 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> Sent: den 26 maj 2021 04:10 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release We have enough binding votes from IPMC now, so let's close the vote and finish the release? Thanks. 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2021年5月20日周四 下午4:17写道： > As Nathan Hartman is an ASF member now, you could ask to join the > IPMC, then we could have 2 binding votes when releasing... > > And let me contact our champion, he has been really busy recently... > > Thanks. > > Byron Ellacott <b...@the-wanderers.org> 于2021年5月8日周六 下午1:28写道： > >> +1 with caveat that I need to backport the compiler patch. >> >> Toolchain: >> clang version 13.0.0 (g...@github.com:jacobly0/llvm-project.git >> ff3f5b865edbac826fdd251f810da833dda775de) >> Target: ez80-none-unknown-elf >> Thread model: posix >> >> - LICENSE, NOTICE, README.md, DISCLAIMER-WIP present in both >> repositories. >> - Build for eZ80 using commit ID 9d4742af00 backported from master, >> plus patch for Z80 ELF support (PR to happen when tested adequately) >> - Build size is 253,610 text (down from 257,713 bytes for RC0), 197 >> bytes in data (unchanged from RC0) >> >> NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-10.1.0 >> nsh> free >> total used free largest >> Umem: 253856 66272 187584 184736 >> >> -- >> bje >> >> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 1:25 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis >> <acas...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Everyone, please submit some information when you test it: >> > >> > - Used toolchain: i.e. last line of "gcc -v" is enough >> > - ELF nuttx size: i.e. "arm-none-eabi-size nuttx" >> > - Result of internal nsh free command. >> > >> > It will help us to track the size increase from a release to another. >> > >> > BR, >> > >> > Alan >> > >> > On 5/3/21, alin.jerpe...@sony.com <alin.jerpe...@sony.com> wrote: >> > > Hello all, >> > > >> > > This is the latest tarball >> > > >> > > I am sorry for the confusion >> > > >> > > Thanks >> > > Alin >> > > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> >> > > Sent: den 3 maj 2021 17:14 >> > > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release >> > > >> > > On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 1:22 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Hello all, >> > >> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 RC1 has been staged under [1] >> > >> and it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved >> > >> we will seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will >> > >> be open for >> 72hr. >> > >> >> > >> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding >> > >> -1 are required to pass. >> > >> >> > >> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found >> > >> here [3] "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to >> > >> download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, >> > >> and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along >> > >> with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF >> > >> policy on releases." >> > >> >> > >> A document to walk through some of this process has been >> > >> published on our project wiki and can be found here [4]. >> > >> >> > >> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the >> non-RM >> > >> items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) >> > >> >> > >> Thank you all, >> > >> Alin Jerpelea >> > >> >> > >> SCM Information: >> > >> Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1 >> > >> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: >> > >> 3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b >> > >> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: >> > >> 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd >> > >> >> > >> [1] >> > >> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/in >> c >> > >> >> ubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz >> 4 >> > >> HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBF0cM9oFQ$ >> > >> [2] >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apach >> > >> >> e/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx! >> u >> > >> 7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBELDkRTX >> > >> A$ >> > >> [3] >> > >> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html*a >> p >> > >> >> proving-a-release__;Iw!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T >> 2 >> > >> TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBGKE_xsSw$ >> > >> [4] >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis >> > >> >> play/NUTTX/Validating*a*staged*Release__;Kysr!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_ >> 5 >> > >> TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBE_QwknXQ$ >> > > >> > > >> > > Just to be sure I don't misunderstand, this is the latest release >> > candidate >> > > to be tested now? >> > > >> > > In the future, I recommend to increment the -RC numbers each time >> there >> > are >> > > new tarballs, to avoid any potential confusion. >> > > >> > > If this is indeed the latest RC, I'll try to test it today. >> > > >> > > Thanks for all your hard work!! >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Nathan >> > > >> > >> >
