Sort of binary search? You're right, that's faster. I tend to see it like a sequence rather than a searchable collection
El dom, 17 ene 2021 a las 11:15, Nathan Hartman (<hartman.nat...@gmail.com>) escribió: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:36 AM Grr <gebbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Have you tried starting from original, working config and adding and > > testing after _every single_ change? > > > > If you're changing OS elements, maybe one of them is affecting USB > without > > you knowing > > > > Testing at every change is tedious but sometimes the only possible > > technique > > > If you're using version control, and each feature you add is a new commit, > then you can bisect to find which commit breaks USB, with fewer tests than > testing each commit in sequence. > > Nathan >
