No problem, just wanted to clear any possible confusion when considering the idea.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020, at 13:09, Maciej Wójcik wrote: > Sure, Matias. I was not addressing your proposition in any way. I was just > commenting on existing format of READMEs. > > I am neutral regarding separate repository with documentation. At least at > the moment, I need to sleep with the idea (more). > > Some if not all READMES will stay in the repository and I was suggesting > reformatting them. > > Am Fr., 17. Juli 2020 um 17:59 Uhr schrieb Matias N. <mat...@imap.cc>: > > > > > > What I think would be great, is to pick any of this two standards. > > > > What I was trying to convey in my previous e-mail is that we can choose > > Markdown for READMEs (the prefered choice, IMHO) and either Markdown, RST, > > or anything else for the eventual doc-repo. These are independent choices, > > one does not have to affect the other. In fact, maybe RST is better for the > > doc-repo, since it supports richer syntax more apropriate for building > > documentation. > > > > Best, > > Matias >
