Hi Brennan,

I did a basic test on STM32F4Discovery board compiling the "nsh" and
everything worked fine (see below).

My VOTE: +1


I compared it to release 9.0 and noticed it increased about 3 KiB of
Flash usage, but I didn't check further to see what happened.

NuttX 9.0

$ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  68624     104    2496   71224   11638 nuttx


NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-9.0.0
nsh> free
             total       used       free    largest
Umem:       192976       7536     185440     125248
nsh>


NuttX 9.1 RC0

$ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  71732     104    2476   74312   12248 nuttx


NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-9.1.0
nsh> free
             total       used       free    largest
Umem:       192992       7536     185456     125264
nsh>


Good work guys!

BR,

Alan

On 6/23/20, Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to
> vote
> on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final release
> approval
> from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
>
> Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity
> involved
> in the build process.  We have tried to make some improvements around this
> for
> new people to the project and are in the process of updating our sites and
> wiki
> to simplify the getting started process.
> Two starting points:
>  * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is extensive.
>  * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently
> unofficial
>    opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers.
>
>
> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
> are required to pass.
>
> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4]
> "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
> source code package,
> compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own
> platform, along
> with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF
> policy on releases."
>
> A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
> our project wiki
> and can be found here [5].  I did try to walk through this document,
> but please comment
> if you find anything not clear.
>
> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
> items in [5])
> [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
>
> Thank you all,
> Brennan Ashton
>
> SCM Information:
>   Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC0
>   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
> 5d5e6f7192d24a6241aa3e22c729a85eda7afe2d
>   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
> 6fd57ba0712a78b20bd3ce49022924810a5552c7
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/9.1.0-RC0/
> [2]
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-9.1.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes
> [3] https://nuttx-companion.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
> [4] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> [5]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release
>

Reply via email to