Very nice Maciej! Good job! Kudos!
On 6/15/20, Maciej Wójcik <w8j...@gmail.com> wrote: > Update on development of NuttX kconfig browser. > > It is now possible to upload and display existing `.config` file. > > [image: Screenshot from 2020-06-15 12-21-08.png] > > > What I am planning next is to provide more detail on each entry. Similar to > what Zephyr does in it's Kconfig cross-reference > https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/reference/kconfig/index-drivers.html > > We have the same type of information because I am using the same library. > > Any suggestions how it could look are welcome. > > Full list of changes: > https://gitlab.com/w8jcik/nuttx-config-tree-ui/-/releases/0.3 > > Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 16:21 Uhr schrieb Maciej Wójcik <w8j...@gmail.com>: > >> A suggestion: when the user click on the option it should be nice to see >>> the Help for that option. >> >> >> I have added a side panel with entry description >> http://nuttx-config.nxtlabs.pl >> >> [image: Screenshot from 2020-06-03 16-08-40.png] >> >> It would be great to also show dependencies, reverse-dependencies and >> allow navigation. >> >> Could you have an option to upload a defconfig to see the settings based >>> on it? >> >> >> I should be able to do this. I could allow dropping of a file into the >> browser and then it would filter the tree based on it. Also display >> values >> next to every entry. >> >> Is it what you have in mind? If not, could you describe how it should >> work? >> >> Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 15:59 Uhr schrieb David Sidrane < >> david.sidr...@nscdg.com>: >> >>> Hi Maciej, >>> >>> Could you have an option to upload a defconfig to see the settings based >>> on >>> it? >>> >>> David >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Maciej Wójcik [mailto:w8j...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2020 8:23 PM >>> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: NuttX config browser >>> >>> Hello Alan, >>> >>> A suggestion: when the user click on the option it should be nice to >>> > see the Help for that option. >>> >>> >>> Sure, I will add a side pane. >>> >>> Regarding online IDE. I was trying few times to switch to online >>> development. The problem is that to debug or even to connect to nsh, one >>> still needs local software and local copy of entire project. Which is >>> against the basic reason why we would like to develop online. It is also >>> a >>> bit difficult to come up with own, custom online IDE. It is simply a lot >>> of >>> work, for a team of people. >>> >>> That being said I can easily imagine using existing online IDE to >>> develop >>> NuttX project. It could be just described how to do it efficiently. For >>> example git repository can be cloned to GitLab and opened with their >>> IDE. >>> Then binary comes from pipeline which can be flashed to the >>> microcontroller. Some simple client can be created which automates >>> flashing. Still the issue of debugging remains. >>> >>> I will take a look at MBED and see how did they solve the issue. >>> >>> Am So., 31. Mai 2020 um 22:09 Uhr schrieb Alan Carvalho de Assis < >>> acas...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> > Hi Maciej, >>> > >>> > A suggestion: when the user click on the option it should be nice to >>> > see the Help for that option. >>> > >>> > Do you think it could be possible to do it? >>> > >>> > Did you test MBED platform in the browser ever? They have an online >>> > IDE where people can create an application, compile it and load the >>> > firmware in the board. >>> > >>> > It should be nice if we could have a way to compile NuttX in the >>> > browser, like MBED is doing for a long time (more than 8 years at >>> > least). >>> > >>> > BR, >>> > >>> > Alan >>> > >>> > On 5/31/20, Maciej Wójcik <w8j...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> Maciej's tool is much easier to use. Maciej has several other cool >>> > >> NuttX >>> > >> tools. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Thank you Greg for a good word. I will work on this configuration >>> > > browser >>> > > more and I am glad to contribute it if the community will find it >>> > > useful. >>> > > Regarding the other tools, I had one more project but I >>> overcomplicated >>> > it >>> > > and it ended up nowhere. I am still working on it from time to time, >>> but >>> > I >>> > > can't promise it will ever be production ready. >>> > > >>> > > Am So., 31. Mai 2020 um 19:18 Uhr schrieb spudaneco < >>> spudan...@gmail.com >>> > >: >>> > > >>> > >> The configuration document he is referring to is not in the >>> repository. >>> > >> I >>> > >> used to create it only for releases using a custom tool at >>> > >> tools/mkconfigvars.shMaciej's tool is much easier to use.Maciej has >>> > >> several >>> > >> other cool NuttX tools. In a meritocracy, I think contributing >>> > >> these >>> > >> to >>> > >> the project would score pretty high (hint, hint, hint)Sent from >>> Samsung >>> > >> tablet. >>> > >> -------- Original message --------From: Brennan Ashton < >>> > >> bash...@brennanashton.com> Date: 5/31/20 11:04 AM (GMT-06:00) To: >>> > >> dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: NuttX config browser On Sun, May >>> 31, >>> > >> 2020, 9:17 AM Maciej Wójcik <w8j...@gmail.com> wrote:> That >>> document is >>> > >> old, from NuttX 8.2 and needs to be updated.>>> Yes, now I remember >>> > >> that >>> > >> there was some page with configuration options. I> think it serves >>> the >>> > >> purpose. It could be auto generated using CI, then it> wouldn't be >>> > >> outdated. Still I thought it could be a bit more interactive>It is >>> > >> built >>> > >> via CI on every build, but only hosts the latest releaseversion not >>> > >> master.Maybe there is a regeneration step that's actually >>> > >> missing... >>> I >>> > >> will >>> > >> needto look at that, right now we just issue the inlining in the >>> > >> docs >>> > >> build.--Brennan> >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >
