On Sun, Apr 12, 2020, 4:55 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > With this in mind and with the suggestion from Brennan, the branch > > would be "releases/9.0.0" > > There there would be tags on the branch to differentiate 9.0.1 from > 9.0.2? and from release candidates? > > So would the branch name releases/9.0 still be OK? The tags on the > branch would pick up the 3rd digit? I don't really care and I am trying > to leave the decisions in the hands of the people doing the work. No > need for bossy spectators; no need for spectators period. But I thought > I should mention that. > > Greg > This all seems very reasonable to me. No need to bikeshed too much, we can always learn from the release and refine as we go along. We should probably figure out how this patch would be represented in code and if we want to have 9.0.0-RC1 or whatever supported. >
