>
> @mentors Do we have the ability to add a Git hub PR and Issue template?
>
There at least one project using this:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
I didn't go through all the Apache projects, maybe there are others.

What do you think should be added in a PR template in our case? Does a
phrase like the one from the link above suffice?
Issues template can be more populated with different templates for bug
reports, help request, etc.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 PM David Sidrane <david.sidr...@nscdg.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> We spend a lot of time on PRs repeating ourselves on format, license.
>
>
>
> Giving directed links and examples will not challenge contributors with
> having to ferret this out on their own.
>
>
>
> @mentors Do we have the ability to add a Git hub PR and Issue template?
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Abdelatif Guettouche [mailto:notificati...@github.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2020 4:42 AM
> *To:* apache/incubator-nuttx
> *Cc:* David Sidrane; Mention
> *Subject:* Re: [apache/incubator-nuttx] Support for Litex VexRiscV (#595)
>
>
>
> @aenrbs New files need to have an Apache license. Kconfig, README and auto
> generated files like defconfig don't need a license.
> Note that the license holder in all of this PRs files is Gregory Nutt.
> Gregory Nutt has already submitted an ICLA and gave his approval to change
> his license header.
>
> @davids5 <https://github.com/davids5> As of now, we don't. Some has
> adopted
> their own templates when submitting PRs.
> We may want to add Github's templates for PRs/Issues. Maybe we bring this
> to the dev list for a discussion on what should be there?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/595#issuecomment-601657889
> >,
> or unsubscribe
> <
> https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAO3BXP3H2FN5LPATMWNSNTRINJCJANCNFSM4LQFCQSA
> >
> .
>

Reply via email to