Hi, I personally deliberately avoided number of commits/PRs in the report as I saw Justin giving the same remark in his review to other reports that did that, and I believe he has a good argument.
Probably a better stats would be number of PRs from new contributors, that will show that the project is attracting new people and growing its community. Significant additions could also make it to the report, like new architectures, new subsystems, etc. On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:10 PM Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 to more metrics about community, code changes, etc. I have signed off in > any case. > > -Flavio > > > On 6 Feb 2020, at 03:27, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > > > HI, > > > >> Instead of giving absolute numbers, why not say there was an increase of x% > >> in the number of PRs applied, etc > > > > Which is slightly better but without context or explanation to why this > > happened it’s mostly meaningless for people outside the project. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > > > >
