On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 11:19 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > We should get things done first, and then try to make it better. > > For now I agree that the most important thing is to let people contribute, > although the automate CI is not ready, the committers could do the check > manually and start to accept patches/PRs. > > Thanks. > > Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> 于2019年12月22日周日 上午10:06写道： > > > I really want to let people to contribute (myself included) ASAP so I was > > to propose this as an option to get going and can be amended later. I > know > > it does not resolve all the issues, but offers what I think is a > reasonable > > avenue to get started. > > > > Submit a PR on GitHub against master if it is approved by one commiter > > (that did not propose it) it can be merged. The approval is done via the > > GitHub approval system. > > > > A commiter may create a PR on behalf of a patch submitted to the mailing > > list. > > > > Commiters can ask for others to review or approve. But at the end of the > > day they are the ones who approve and merge. > > > > We can and should amend this later, it is likely not enough long term. > > > > Could people vote if they think this is fine to start. If you don't agree > > just note that and we can review where we are at. > > > > --Brennan > > *PROVIDED* that we continue to hash out the workflow procedures, I would support that FOR A LIMITED TIME -- TWO WEEKS. By January 1st we had better have a polished workflow document ready for the PMC to vote on. Nathan
