Agreed!

Gosh I am hoping I am not talking down to people. I just remember my
learning curve with git. If we are continuing to use git and I assume we
are: My comments are meant to help people that do not understand how to use
git for the process and evaluate what they will have to do if we choose a
specific implementation.

Would you please layout the step for using patches and educate us on that
process as well


David

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 8:19 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS - NuttX Workflow]


>> What about the people who are just learning Nuttx? Simple is
>> relative. I can see how a check out of one folder would make it hard
>> in your setup and simple for the New folks is'nt that way we are here
>> to grow the project?
> users should not need to learn details of the workflow
>> BTW: your argument is solve by sub modules. You would just check out
>> from nuttx repo
>> It is also very helpful to have multiple remotes
>> nuttx
>>   nuttx ASF nuttx repo
>> apps
>>    nat   nathan's apps repo
>>    nuttx ASF apps repo
>>
>> git fetch nuttx
>> git log nuttx/apps - hmm that changed in make in afd890
>> git reset --hard nat/apps
>> git cherry-pick afd890
>>
> Please no... save the github chatter for another day, another thread.
> I refuse to even look at that

Requirements specification is a top-down activity.  It is only driven by
end users needs and project objects.  NOT by implementation.  That is
the nature of System Engineering: top-down

Design for an implementation, on the other hand, is usually a bottoms-up
activity:  You implement the lowest level foundations of the system and
build on top of that to complete the full functional requirements.

This is extreme bad, bad engineering to drive system functional
requirements base on pre-determined implementation of the lowest level.
It is a terrible, unprofessional practice.  We need to keep proper
top-down system engineering practices, and not get derailed by this low
level stuff.

We do indeed need pick the nicest dress from show room window based upon
what we really want, not be rummaging through the bargain for the
cheapest thing.

Let's get profressional!

Greg

Reply via email to