Hi Nathan, On 12/13/19, Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 8:53 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Another thing to consider with the form of the release is that there an >> many, many documents, Wikis, READMEs, HowTos, blogs, and videos >> describing how to get started with NuttX. They all begin either 'git >> clone' apps/ and nuttx/ (or download the tarballs). Changing that means >> breaking a lot of things. > > > There is no reason to change that. > > Releases should be in the form of tarballs and those who wish to hack > on NuttX or be on the bleeding edge can clone the git repos. Nothing > changes there except the URL where you download those things (and the > fact that the PMC members will digitally sign the release tarballs > with our PGP/GPG keys). To minimize confusion, all the places that > have until now hosted NuttX tarballs and git repos should have a big > "WE HAVE MOVED!" message with our new address. > > Not directly related but Greg mentioned Google and LinkedIn: > > I suggest that we really need to get all discussions, participation, > and contributions "under one roof" so to speak, at > dev@nuttx.apache.org. I think the Slack, the Google Group, the > LinkedIn Group, and any other forums that fragment participants, > should wind up soon. Whenever we reply to a message there, we should > remind people that those forums are deprecated and that they should > join dev@nuttx.apache.org. >
I think at least the LinkedIn group is not in this category of removing users from the mailing list, quite the opposite. The LinkedIn group goal is to advertise and show projects and products using NuttX. Many people discovered NuttX thanks our announcements there. There is not a discussion group in the Linkedin, but only a showcase for NuttX. We can turn it off is all people here decide to do so, but I think we will shoot the foot if we do it. Just my two cents. BR, Alan