Hello I will be unavailable to conduct release management now for probably the next week or two. I'll come back to this thread when able to dive in.
Thanks On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:11 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > K - sounds good. Will circle back in a few days. > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:56 PM Andy LoPresto <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks for starting this thread Joe. I agree the back-pressure fix is one >> that will help the community a lot. I am currently working on a couple >> security features which would also greatly benefit users. I’d like to see >> these get in 1.12.0 if possible, especially as there are some changes that >> have already gone into master which I don’t think are ready to be released >> and then required to be supported. Some are already up as PRs. >> >> My preferences, ranked: >> >> 1. Wait a few days on 1.12.0, release it with the new security features >> and the back-pressure fix (along with the other 170+) >> 2. Release 1.11.5 immediately for the back-pressure fix >> 3. Release 1.12.0 immediately for the back-pressure fix and the security >> features have to wait for 1.13.0 >> >> Andy LoPresto >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> He/Him >> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 >> >> > On May 13, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Team, >> > >> > A couple folks have recently reported slowness in the UI in the recent >> > releases particularly with larger and more production style flows. It >> > appears to be related to when back pressure prediction is enabled [1]. >> > >> > It also appears this is already fixed [2] and on 1.12.0-SNAPSHOT. >> > >> > I'd like to produce a release which captures this. It isn't clear that >> > 1.12 is ready to roll but happy to look into that path if so. There are >> > already 177+ closed JIRAs on that thing!! >> > >> > Alternatively if easier I could kick out another on 1.11 which would be >> > 1.11.5 and go looking opportunistically for other bits to grab as well. >> > >> > Any thoughts? >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7437 >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7087 >> > >> > Thanks >> > Joe >> >>
