Sounds good to me and agree that it makes more sense! Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 01:43, Joe Witt <[email protected]> a écrit :
> makes sense to me > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 5:14 PM Samuel Hjelmfelt > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > If there are no objections, I would like to rename NiFi-Fn to Stateless > > NiFi. This is more intuitive for the uninitiated and makes it easier to > > differentiate the FaaS use cases from other use cases (e.g. long-running > > stateless flows). > > > > > > > > Originally, it was called MagNiFi to draw the comparison to MiNiFi, but > > the name had to be changed due to a trademark. NiFi-Fn was a reasonable > fit > > given opportunity for FaaS, but it has been leading to confusion given > that > > there are other places that we could use it. Long running processes in > > particular do not feel like functions (even if they technically are). > > > > > > From a code perspective, I would just change the directory to > > "nifi-stateless" and class names from "FnProcessSession" to > > "StatelessProcessSession" for example. > > > > > > -Sam >
