+1, sounds like a great idea On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <sivaprasanna...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin. > > > > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <jvw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering. > > > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <kdoran.apa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <alopre...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1. > > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto > > > > alopre...@apache.org > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D > EF69 > > > > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hey folks, > > > >> > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of > > our > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that > > committers > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and > > transitioning > > > to > > > >> GitBox [2]. > > > >> > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change, > > only > > > in > > > >> when and how it happens. There was a previous discussion over this > > > topic > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the > > > logistics > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never > > > >> executed. > > > >> > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation. The process > > > looks to > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in > > requiring > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based > remotes. > > > >> > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket > > and > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make > > this > > > >> happen. Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass > migration > > > that > > > >> would happen later. > > > >> > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my > > > prior > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen. > > > >> > > > >> --aldrin > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > > >> [3] > > > >> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
