Russell,

I just put the ticket it because I saw the need for the processor. Glad to
see someone taking it up.

Cheers,

Edgardo

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Russell Whitaker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Very cool Joe. OK, I'll start the ball rolling at work - I post from my
> personal
> address but all my traffic here is in fact work-related :-) - and
> account for this
> effort in our work tracking system. Not having a GetScp processor already
> available means this will add some front-loaded effort to some of the
> ingestion
> work in our pipeline, but the payoff is sufficient to make it worth it for
> us.
>
> Thanks for being open to my doing this in Clojure.
>
> Cheers, R
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In my personal view they are welcome and an important part of growth
> > of NiFi.  These are of course non-trivial contributions both to do and
> > to bring in but that is ok provided both sides know it will take time.
> > JVM friendly ones are less of a big deal of course but never the less
> > this is the sort of things lots of folks will have strong views on I
> > suspect.
> >
> > Let's pick one off the list that you care about the most and see where
> > we can go with it.  You like Clojure and it is JVM friendly.  Let's
> > start there ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Joe
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Russell Whitaker
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi Joe,
> >>
> >> My SCP code is not at all a processor, it's standalone Clojure code
> >> importing JSch libs. I
> >> suppose I could adapt it and make it a Nifi processor, sure, and yes,
> >> I'd certainly both need
> >> and welcome guidance. If this is the case, I'd like to revisit a
> >> question I asked a few months
> >> ago on this list: would a non-Java but JVM-targetted language like
> >> Clojure fit in with the
> >> core project's build & deployment systems? I've done mixed
> >> Java/Clojure projects at work, but I also
> >> have complete control over pom.xml & project.clj Maven/Leiningen
> artifacts.
> >>
> >> TL;DR: are Clojure/Scala/etc. non-Java JVM language contributions
> welcome or an
> >> administrative burden?
> >>
> >> Thanks, R
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Russell,
> >>>
> >>> It is possible that the PR was closed as we moved from 'develop' to
> >>> 'master'.  I had reached out but I think Tim has been busy with other
> >>> things.  If you have an SCP oriented processor we'd happily help guide
> >>> it in as a contribution.  Folks have asked for this fairly often over
> >>> the years so this would be cool.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Joe
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Russell Whitaker
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-539
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey Mark and Edgardo,
> >>>>
> >>>> This was marked in July as having been moved to 0.4.0; any chance
> >>>> there might be a .nar available now I could add in /lib and start
> using?
> >>>> I was delighted to see Tim Reardon's note from May where he said:
> >>>>
> >>>> "I have recently written a PutScp processor that is holding up well to
> >>>> moderate volumes. It is modeled after the PutFTP/PutSFTP processors,
> >>>> using the JCraft JSch library. I will clean up and submit a pull
> >>>> request."
> >>>>
> >>>> The abovementioned Jira ticket doesn't show a notation about what
> happened with
> >>>> Tim's PR, if it ever happened. I have my own JSch-based solution for
> >>>> this (written in
> >>>> Clojure) which is run out of cron (ugh) and I'd love to replace it
> >>>> with a GetScp
> >>>> processor solution.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks, R
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Russell Whitaker
> >>>> http://twitter.com/OrthoNormalRuss
> >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/russell-whitaker/0/b86/329
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Russell Whitaker
> >> http://twitter.com/OrthoNormalRuss
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/russell-whitaker/0/b86/329
>
>
>
> --
> Russell Whitaker
> http://twitter.com/OrthoNormalRuss
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/russell-whitaker/0/b86/329
>



-- 
Cheers,

Edgardo

Reply via email to