Hi Baptiste,

On 5/4/15 10:16 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
I just drafted that for informing about the ML terminations:
https://github.com/mojohaus/mojohaus.github.io/wiki/Termination-mail

WDYT?

Looks great for me...

Good work...

Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise


2015-05-04 21:49 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com
<mailto:codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>>:

    some statistics:

    user: 645 subscribers
    dev: 334 subscribers
    announce: 92 subscribers
    scm: 63 subscribers

    So the user ML is by far the largest. However, its topics often
    concern a specific plugin. It would be nice if Github had some sort
    of space to ask per-(sub)project questions.
    Even though I still like the announcement idea, numbers reflect that
    it's not used very much.

    So I agree with the suggestions below.

    Robert

    Op Mon, 04 May 2015 20:52:48 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus
    <bmat...@batmat.net <mailto:bmat...@batmat.net>>:

        OK, so, to try and sum up the discussions and reading the ML we
        currently
        have under http://mojo.codehaus.org/mail-lists.html, I think the
        current
        agreement is as follows:


            - Development List : already moved to
        https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mojohaus-dev
            - Commits List : let it die. We'll see in the future if we
        want one list
            with the commits. May be useful to keep a log of the commits
        for reference.
            Doesn't seem to be necessary in the short term though.
        There're more
            pressing concerns currently.
            - User List : let it die, and inform users to use
        us...@maven.apache.org <mailto:us...@maven.apache.org>.
            That's actually already what happens most of the time anyway.
            - Announcements List : same as user list. I don't see us
        keeping it;


        WDYT? Do you agree?


        2015-05-04 20:38 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte
        <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com <mailto:codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>>:

            If the google group is fully up and running, then I don't
            see any reason
            for voting.
            You could do a (pre-)announcement saying this ML will be
            unavailable soon
            and still interested subscribers should move to google groups.
            Looking at Xircles, I don't see an option to really close a
            mailing list,
            although I have the karma to remove everybody one by one. I
            don't think
            it's worth doing so, so I suggest to just bleed those lists
            to death and
            make all subscribers aware of the shift.

            Robert

            Op Mon, 04 May 2015 20:25:34 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus <
            bmat...@batmat.net <mailto:bmat...@batmat.net>>:


              Yes. My point was more indeed more to make people aware
            that this is NOW.


                About the ML, we already have a new one created on
                google groups. I could
                have started a vote, granted, but as the discussion
                didn't give much
                feedback nor candidates (ggroups and freelists by
                Alexandre), so I went
                for
                the shortcut option. Would you prefer to have a vote for
                that and
                reconsider where we go for the MLs?

                2015-05-04 19:41 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte
                <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com
                <mailto:codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>>:

                  Hi,


                    I don't think we have a real choice here. Once the
                    Codehaus domain is
                    gone
                    including its infra then there are no mailinglists
                    anymore.
                    The vote should be about the move to X and how to
                    register it for
                    Markmail
                    and Nabble.

                    Robert

                    Op Mon, 04 May 2015 15:36:52 +0200 schreef Baptiste
                    Mathus <
                    bmat...@batmat.net <mailto:bmat...@batmat.net>>:


                      Hi,


                        So, as a followup with the upcoming Codehaus
                        shutdown, to go forward and
                        try to attract attention to those who may have
                        missed the other quite
                        verbose threads .

                        Let's

                        Vote open for 72h max (don't know if we
                        could/should wait less), will
                        NOT
                        succeed by lazy consensus.

                        [ ] +1 : deprecate/disable the Mojo@Codehaus
                        related mailing lists
                        [ ] 0 : meh
                        [ ] -1 : don't do it 'cause


                    
---------------------------------------------------------------------
                    To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

                    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





            
---------------------------------------------------------------------
            To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

            http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to