On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:51:18 +0100 Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jore...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I second the opinions for moving to GitHub (or Bitbucket) instead of > remaining in SVN. > If doing so, I suggest we reuse as much as possible of the GitHub > infrastructure - Wiki, Issue Tracker, Mailing lists etc. > If we are already bound for some major migrations, let's make the best of > them - and a Distributed version control system is a productivity boost. > > Also - is there really a point to maintain a particular GroupID (i.e. > org.codehaus). > I belive we could/should move Mojo's development efforts into the Apache > umbrella (why have 2 sources of normative plugins - apache and codehaus) to > simplify for users. I really like this idea to *merge* mojo projets with maven plugins one or something at apache house. I guess there is some legal issue about it ? or not ? -- Tony Chemit -------------------- tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 http://www.codelutin.com email: che...@codelutin.com twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
