Thanks, will improve the introduction page -Dan
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: > Ah, right. If I had just followed the link to bitbucket I would have seen > that. Then I have no objections. > The text about "a fork" is a bit misleading though and could be improved > to indicate that this is "the fork". :-) > > /Anders > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> enchanter at googlecode is dead. and I am willing to maintain it here. >> >> Thanks >> >> -Dan >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: >> >>> Do we want to maintain forks here at Mojo? Can't the enhancements be >>> pushed to the original plugin? >>> >>> /Anders >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I would like to graduate this plugin out of sandbox and push the first >>>> beta release. >>>> >>>> The site is at >>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/enchanter/enchanter-maven-plugin/ >>>> >>>> Let me know if there any objection on this. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
