Yes, sorry for the noise.
2013/8/6 Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> > I think this mail should have gone to the Maven dev list, right? > > /Anders > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Baptiste MATHUS <bmat...@batmat.net>wrote: > >> >> 2013/8/6 Barrie Treloar <baerr...@gmail.com> >> >>> On 6 August 2013 16:39, christofer.d...@c-ware.de >>> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >>> > Ok ... >>> > >>> > well I did read that naming info, I was just confused how to actually >>> read it :-) >>> > >>> > "Apache Maven" "plugin" or "Apache" "Maven plugin" ... you see there >>> are two semantics on how you could understand this. In my case it would >>> actually be a "Maven plugin" from an Apache Project, but it's not a plugin >>> from the "Apache Maven" Project ;-) >>> > >>> > But I the Definition regarding the Location of the sources is far less >>> ambiguous. >>> > >>> >>> Patches to improve documentation most welcome :) >>> >> >> Patches to improve documentation most welcome :) >> >> Hi, >> >> I've attached a small improvement proposal on >> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGSITE-180 to try being clearer about >> the naming pattern. >> If someone can review and commit it if OK, that'd be great. >> >> Cheers >> >> -- Baptiste >> > > -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
