You can ignore *MRPM-137*, it's unrelated. I have verified that I get the same error as you on Ubuntu Server. With out debugging it in detail I'm quite sure it's the *org.codehaus.mojo.unix:unix-rpm* library that fails to parse the output of *rpm -qlvp <RPM>. * * * I rewrote the Integration Tests to only use groovy + rpm and not depend on unix-rpm. Applying that patch http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRPM-141 all tests passes also on Debian based distros.
// Rickard On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Rickard von Essen < rickard.von.es...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I hade planed to do some work on the rpm plug. But currently I'm pulling > two jobs so it hade to wait a while. > > I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRPM-137 might fix the IT for > you. I use vagrant to verify that everything works in CentOS while > developing on OS X. I attach my Vagrantfile. > > Happy hacking! > > // Rickard > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <bmat...@batmat.net>wrote: > >> That's exactly what I was trying to do :). >> The thing is, I thought afterwards, I haven't an rpm-based system. I'm >> running kubuntu. So I installed rpm through apt-get. I don't if this is >> known to have issues. >> >> FYI, in fact, I fear things aren't going to run totally smoothly since >> I'm already running into an IT failure (rpm-1): >> " post-build script did not succeed. /usr/myusr/app/bin/filter.txt does >> not exist " >> >> I'm gonna have to dig a bit here. If necessary, I guess I'll install some >> VM running RH or do it from some machine at work, but I'm not yet even sure >> the IT wouldn't fail there too. >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> 2013/6/25 Mirko Friedenhagen <mfriedenha...@gmail.com> >> >>> Hello Baptiste, >>> >>> I think it would be great you made the release-manager. I would suggest >>> a SNAPSHOT deploy of the trunk with the fix and Daniels confirmation, that >>> the fix worked for him before, though. >>> >>> Regards Mirko >>> -- >>> Sent from my mobile >>> On Jun 25, 2013 6:11 PM, "Baptiste Mathus" <bmat...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> No timeline. But though I personally dont use this plugin, if nobody >>>> steps up/objects I can do it those days. >>>> If the bug is already fixed, that seems quite an easy task to provide >>>> users satisfaction. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Le 25 juin 2013 17:54, "Daniel Lipofsky" <dlipof...@gmail.com> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> 2.1-alpha-2 was released Aug 2012, and I know there is at least 1 bug >>>>> fix since then that I am interested in, so I was wondering if there is a >>>>> timeline for this. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net >> Sauvez un arbre, >> Mangez un castor ! >> > >
