I'm -1 on not requiring a vote. I think that votes should be required for all releases, even patch releases.
If we want to ease the process a little for patch releases, we can do so in other ways as Stephen outlined. We can discuss that further in a new thread, depending on how this vote goes. On 2012-05-16 02:03, Christopher Hunt wrote: > Hi there, > > I propose that the Mojo project should not require votes for patch releases > (see (1) for a comprehensive definition of a patch release). Voting requires > a minimum of 72 hours to pass which may exceed a reasonable timeframe by > which to deliver bug fixes. There should also be no barriers to fixing bugs > in a release that is entirely backwardly compatible with its public API. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. > > Kind regards, > Christopher Hunt > > (1) http://semver.org/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > -- Dennis Lundberg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
