On 2012-03-07 22:54, Robert Scholte wrote: > I've tested it QDox, which has a huge difference between current > 2.0-SNAPSHOT and the 1.12 > It all seems to run fine. > But I just noticed serious issues in the CPD-report[1] and a few small > ones in the checkstyle-report[2]. > > So for now I'll give it +0.
Thanks for reviewing Robert. > These things should be easy to fix (I can pick them up). > It all works, but IMHO now it looks a bit too dirty. I'm going forward with the release despite these problems, but I have created an issue in JIRA to track them: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLIRR-46 > -Robert > > [1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/clirr-maven-plugin/cpd.html > [2] http://mojo.codehaus.org/clirr-maven-plugin/checkstyle.html > > On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:11:18 +0100, Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to release version 2.4 of the Clirr Maven Plugin. >> >> Clirr is an application, which allows you to compare binaries or sources >> for compatibility. The Clirr Maven Plugin allows you to use Clirr from >> Maven. >> >> We solved 9 issues: >> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11227&version=17073 >> >> >> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MCLIRR+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide >> >> >> Staging Repositories: >> General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/ >> Exclusive: >> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-013/ >> >> Site: >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/clirr-maven-plugin/ >> >> SCM Tag: >> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/clirr-maven-plugin-2.4 >> >> ADDITIONAL_INFORMATION >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. >> >> >> >> Regards > > -- Dennis Lundberg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
