By next time there will, one hopes, be a release of the checkstyle plugin with an unbusted copy of checkstyle.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote: > Benson, > > let's fix these errors the next time. We can explain the problem. You might > want to make a jira-task so you won't forget. > > -Robert > ________________________________ > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:13:26 +0200 > From: and...@hammar.net > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] checkstyle frustration > > We need to wait for the release of m-checkstyle-plugin v2.7. > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1660 > > /Anders > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 03:29, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > checkstyle 5.0 goes ape when faced with '@goal' in a javadoc comment. > (it gets an exception and reports it.) > > checkstyle 5.1 is rumored to have an option to disable this. Not only > isn't there a checkstyle plugin that uses 5.1, there doesn't even seem > to be a copy of checkstyle 5.1 itself in central. > > So, unless someone can tell me a way to specify @goal without seeming > to have an illegal javadoc snail, we're stuck with five errors in the > cobertura plugin. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
