+1 for me 2007/6/25, Garvin LeClaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1 I think we (plug-in developers) should be checking our site documentation regularly for "compliance'. This only helps other adopt and use these plug-ins if the documentation is consistent and complete. -- Regards, Garvin LeClaire [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 6/24/07, Jerome Lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > could there be a sort of report, maybe weekly, that lists the sites > > > that don't comply to the docck plugin ? > > > > Hmm, well we could add the docck-plugin [1] to the parent, that way > all > > plugins would be nagged for compliance when they are built. > > +1 > > J > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >
