yep, it did (and your test)
Mike Perham wrote: > I don't think the list got this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Perham > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:47 PM > To: 'dev@mojo.codehaus.org' > Subject: RE: [mojo-dev] Release cobertura plugin > > I'm -1 on releasing Cobertura until we fix MOJO-226 and MOJO-271. I > have just submitted a patch to fix both but it is controversial and I > would like a core M2 dev to review it before I am willing to commit it. > > Cobertura requires asm and a bunch of others to instrument but requires > nothing to actually run the instrumented code during tests. So I cloned > cobertura into a separate cobertura-runtime artifact and add that to the > project classpath instead of the cobertura artifact itself. It's a hack > but I don't know of any cleaner way to handle the situation. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:43 AM > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Release cobertura plugin > > I'm looking at it now. By lots of questions, they're all from the same > user. > > The cobertura plugin has never been released. It doesn't have a JIRA > component because its in the sandbox. The Mojo JIRA projects haven't > been created yet, but Jason was collecting the data. > > - Brett > > Carlos Sanchez wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There're problems with cobertura and 2.0.2, could somebody take care >> of making a bugfix release to address at least that problem that is >> causing compatibility problems? it's causing lots of questions in the >> mailing list. >> >> BTW is it possible to create a JIRA project for each of the active >> plugins so we can keep better track of releases? >> >> Regards >> >
