On 1/11/06, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been looking at some plugins in the sandbox and I see some issues: > > 1. If sandbox plugins deploy sites, (as they probably should so they get > some visability), the scm connections are wrong because they inherit from > the mojo parent. > 2. Some plugins have the name maven-xxx-plugin instead of xxx-maven-plugin > 3. Many plugins aren't even posted on the mojo site. > > I'd like to have a vote on these issues: > > 1a. Should we create a mojo-sandbox parent and have sandbox plugins derive > from here? This way we can set the scm urls and anything else that comes > along here. Only the parent section would need to change when a plugin > graduates from the sandbox.
+1 > 2. Should we correct the plugin names? +1 > > 3. Should all sandbox plugins be added to the mojo sandbox site? +1 > > Thx. > > >
