What about inheritance? Other tools that may want to do something
with the annotations?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-06-28 6:06 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
could be better maybe.
But means 1.6 required.
Do you want to work on a branch with this change ?
2012/6/28 Milos Kleint <[email protected]>:
why not use jdk's own annotation processors (which get compiled by
javac are we save ourselves an extra mojo execution)?
Milos
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
We use asm to collect annotations from compiled classes (so scope compile )
Makes sense ?
2012/6/28 Milos Kleint <[email protected]>:
Hello,
I'm in the process of rewriting the nbm-maven-plugin at mojo to use
the new annotations instead of javadoc tags. It appears to be working
fine, but I'm wondering why the retention policy is CLASS. Since it's
only used to generate the xml file, it could be turned into SOURCE and
the annotation dependency could be made "provided". Am I missing
something?
Regards
Milos Kleint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
