Hmm, ok, just means we should maybe rush in supporting type or scope sets in plugins instead of having so much hardcoded defaults cause these are common cases (similarly having an artifact available for some compiling execution, some build plugin but nothing else).
Thanks for confirming. Le mar. 4 févr. 2025 à 17:54, Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit : > Le 2025-02-04 à 16 h 27, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > > there are still processors which are runtime jars, would you make them > > declared twice and deduplicated by maven for relevant phases/scopes? > > > The same JAR file which would need to be both on the class-path and on > the annotation processor path? Yes, they would need to be declared twice > with different scope. But I think that it is not different than the > current situation with <type>processor</type>. > > Martin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
