For the sake of completeness: I asked Chris Dutz whether he was aware of other 
ASF projects moving from Jira to GH issues.

* He performed such migration for the PLC4X project (but didn’t leave any tools 
to automate that?). Here is a sample for a migrated issue: 
https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/581
* He mentioned other ASF projects (SteamPipe, IoTDB) which might have done 
migrations or hybrid issue management. Perhaps someone is aware of other ASF 
projects as well or has a contact for more information?

> On 6. Dec 2024, at 14:40, Sandra Parsick <spars...@web.de.INVALID> wrote:
> 
> I asked on other channels, how Spring migrated their Jira issues. I got a 
> link to their migration tool:
> 
> https://github.com/rstoyanchev/jira-to-gh-issues
> 
> An updated version can be found here: 
> https://github.com/rwinch/jira-to-gh-issues
> 
> I reviewed the code a little, and it appears that the code is generic enough 
> to give it a trial.
> I will invest some time to do a dry run and share my experience with it.
> 
> Another idea:
> 
> Maven Tycho project also moved from Bugzilla to Github issue. The "migration" 
> was set Bugzilla project read only and only issues were moved to Github which 
> was actively in work.
> 
> Sandra
> 
> 
> Am 04.12.24 um 08:36 schrieb Sandra Parsick:
>> My 2 cent from a user perspective:
>> Spring's approach has a benefit. As a user, I need only search for an issue 
>> in only one location.
>> But I also understand Michael's point, that it is a chance for a cleanup of 
>> the backlog.
>> Regardless of whether all issues should be migrated or not, I could ask the 
>> Spring Team if they could tell more about how they did it.
>> Maven Support and Care has an epic about Backlog Grooming [1] and IMHO the 
>> migration from Jira to Github issue could be a good first task in this epic 
>> (of course, after a decision about the How).
>> Sandra
>> [1] https://github.com/OpenElements/maven-support-care/issues/42
>> Am 25.11.24 um 17:36 schrieb Guillaume Nodet:
>>> They seem to have migrated the issues from JIRA to GitHub.  That would be
>>> #1 option, but I'm not sure if we need to go into that direction.
>>> 
>>> Le ven. 22 nov. 2024 à 17:28, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>>> I know spring teams did such move in the past
>>>> ref:
>>>> 
>>>> https://spring.io/blog/2019/01/15/spring-framework-s-migration-from- 
>>>> jira-to-github-issues
>>>> But I didn't see anything easily reusable...
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:17 PM Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'd like to complete the cleanup, as dicussed earlier, end of this year.
>>>>> This will give us a leaner migration base.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2024/11/22 11:03:09 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>> Following the discussion that happened some time ago about switching to
>>>>> GH
>>>>>> issues...
>>>>>> I think we have several options:
>>>>>>    1/ try to migrate issues and make JIRA read only
>>>>>>    2/ make all our JIRA projects unable to create new issues and new
>>>>> issues
>>>>>> would be raised on GH
>>>>>>    3/ do not change JIRA but slowly switch to GH
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> #1 looks not feasible, so I rule it out, unless someone knows about
>>>>> tools,
>>>>>> but I don't really see how we could recreate history...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> #2 would simply require a switch that could be easily requested to
>>>> INFRA,
>>>>>> but until we have made changes to all projects on github, it could be
>>>>>> problematic as JIRA would be read-only while some projects may not have
>>>>>> issues enabled yet
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The reason for #3 would be to migrate projects not all in one shot.
>>>> All
>>>>>> projects use the same permission scheme in JIRA. I think changing the
>>>>>> scheme would require JIRA administrator privileges, so I don't think
>>>> any
>>>>>> PMC member can do that easily.  However, I know some projects which
>>>> have
>>>>>> done such migration and used JIRA and GH in parallel.  I.e. the source
>>>>> for
>>>>>> release notes would be switched to GH and issues would be either GH
>>>>> issues
>>>>>> or JIRA issues.  This is the least disrupting option.  At some point,
>>>> we
>>>>>> can decide to go to #2.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Arnaud Héritier
>>>> Twitter/GitHub/... : aheritier
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

--
Gerd Aschemann --- Veröffentlichen heißt Verändern (Carmen Thomas)
+49/173/3264070 -- g...@aschemann.net -- http://www.aschemann.net

Reply via email to