Le jeu. 4 janv. 2024 à 11:42, Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit :
> Le 2024-01-04 à 11 h 31, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > >> No, optional dependencies in JPMS are handled by "static requires". > >> > > As explained in previous post it is not always possible cause JPMS > > enforces constraints which are not always respected. > > > I don't understand what you mean. Test case please. > Just take the previous example you even explained yourself with an invalid JPMS name, this is still a valid case today. > > > > Your vision I guess, mine is the opposite from what I saw in OSS land. > > > It is not a vision, it is a fact. I provided a test case. If I'm wrong, > prove it with a test case please. > > Martin > >
